The dada
movement rejected subjectivity and left things up to chance. The dada movement
also really challenged what defines art and challenges the nature of art
itself. Artists wanted to make people understand that works of art are not
defined as art has just objects made but by the reactions of the viewers as
well. Both dada and surrealism questioned the modern society. Surrealism was
considered to be more abstract and unorganized. Both were critics of work of
art and critiquing the bourgeois life style. These movements raise issues on
art and how it is created and also what considers art to be art.
Dada
movement changed the artwork because it was letting chance take over. Dada
movement was a big change in the art world. Duchamp buys objects that are
mass-produced and he challenges the idea that the artist needs to craft
something in order for it to be considered art. With that he brings up the
question as to who is the deciding factor of what art is? Duchamp is a good
example of the dada movement because you can see that he mocks the traditional
art. Especially, with L.H.O.O.Q. that he painted facial hair to the Mona Lisa
painting. I think that Duchamp takes other peoples artwork and just adds minor
details and then calls it his own. Some might say that is not art, but then
again you are questioned with who is the judge of what is art. I question that
his art is actually art. I think that him taking mundane or ready-made objects
and calling them art isn’t really art. Ready-made objects are objects or things
that are mass-produced and things that people may use daily. But I also think
it could be, because it makes the viewer pay more closer attention to the
detail in the objects we see everyday. For example the “Bicycle Wheel” by
Marcel Duchamp, he is taking two objects that are used in everyday life and
puts them together to get people to look at them differently and more closely.
This also goes with that art is just art sake and against saint-Simon said
about art being useful. Duchamp took two useful objects and makes them not
useful.
Surrealism
movement was also against war and the bourgeois style of life. But the
surrealism art was more unorganized and became more abstract, and sometimes
violent. Surrealism had created different techniques to show works of art, such
as the Photomontage. I think that the work done by Salvador Dali called “The
Phenomenon of Ecstasy” was a good example of Photomontage. When looking at this
work you really get that sense that it is a collage of pictures of different
people and different parts of their body. The way that the women are positioned
in the pictures makes the work of art seem somewhat erotic.
Surrealism and the dada movements gave art more ways to let
the artists express themselves. There are more ways that art is created rather
than using a canvas and oil paints. Both raise issues about art and makes
people question art.
The mustache on the Mona Lisa is sort of cliche now but we must think of the reaction to the sacrilege of the very idea when it first was shown. This work, worshiped by the masses, was defaced in such a way that we could never think of it the same way again. It's kind of like when Weird Al does a parody of your favorite song (is he still doing those?)and then his words run through your head when you hear the original. It's funny and annoying at the same time. Back when Dada first started it seemed fairly easy to create controversy and become famous (or infamous)-people are harder to shock now but some artists still try.
ReplyDeleteI seem to enter that problem all the time of who is really the creator of the artworks. Since for many centuries artists employ assistants to create their design it raises important questions. Who's art is it, who came up with the idea, and does the art lose significance because the original creator didn't craft it him or herself. These raise important questions that are just as significant as asking who really owns a corporation if the blue-collar workers are doing all the work.
ReplyDeleteI think it's interesting that you first state that you don't think that readymade object art is actually art. It sounds like with major alterations, that is when you seem to find those pieces actually works of art. To be honest, I'd have to disagree with you. I think that using everyday objects that were even created by a different person than the artist and calling them art is a very interesting concept. I think that everything has artistic value, whether it be creative, humorous, or controversial. Duchamp's works are very creative, humorous, and controversial, making his works very artistic.
ReplyDelete